Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 42675  |
|  Mindsurfer to Digital Man  |
|  Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi  |
|  06 Nov 25 13:49:00  |
 TZUTC: 0000 MSGID: 55211.sync@1:103/705 2d72acfe PID: Synchronet 3.20e-Win32 master/cc717b402 Mar 08 2025 MSC 1929 TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0 BBSID: FUNTOPIA CHRS: CP437 2 FORMAT: flowed Re: Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi By: Digital Man to Mindsurfer on Wed Nov 05 2025 17:58:22 > PF>> I use the built-in command-line FTP client in windows, it takes a > PF>> script file. >> ah, ok. so thats less critical then if you just use insecure ftp locally. >> So in your case it is a sysops solution only. DM> If you classify ftp is insecure, then use ftps instead (yes, Synchronet DM> supports it). But really, no one in the path between the client and your DM> BBS cares what your user password is or the contents of the QWK packets DM> you're transferring, so secure-auth and data privacy is over-kill, but DM> it's there to use if you want it. Okay, let's not call it insecure, but rather unencrypted. But FTPS is good. Then there's no problem at all and you can protect the FTP connection. If it is possible and does not require any special effort, i am always in favour of encrypting the connection. Not overkill but default. Mindsurfer --- þ Synchronet þ FuNToPiA BBS - telnet://funtopia.synchro.net:3023 ssh:3022 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 840 860 880 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35 PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]