Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 42680  |
|  Mindsurfer to poindexter FORTRAN  |
|  Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi  |
|  06 Nov 25 19:50:00  |
 TZUTC: 0000 MSGID: 55216.sync@1:103/705 2d72fbf9 PID: Synchronet 3.20e-Win32 master/cc717b402 Mar 08 2025 MSC 1929 TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0 BBSID: FUNTOPIA CHRS: CP437 2 FORMAT: flowed Re: Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi By: poindexter FORTRAN to Mindsurfer on Thu Nov 06 2025 07:16:44 PF> I'll play devil's advocate here - running insecure protocols on a BBS PF> aren't that big of a deal as long as you're not sharing passwords. I still PF> allow telnet. That's true. I would never disable Telnet. But i also offer ssh. I don't care who is reading transfers of publicly available messages, files and information but at least the passwords should be encrypted if possible. As said before, i try to switch from telnet to ssh where ssh is offered. And in general, i think to encrypt everything should be the default, no matter how valuable the information is. It is ok when the protocols without encryption are needed for backwards compatibility and to keep the retro systems alive and connected. I also understand that you don't come to BBSes for maximum privacy. =) Mindsurfer --- þ Synchronet þ FuNToPiA BBS - telnet://funtopia.synchro.net:3023 ssh:3022 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705) SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 840 860 880 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35 PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]