home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 42708 
 Gamgee to Digital Man 
 Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi 
 08 Nov 25 08:14:09 
 
TZUTC: -0600
MSGID: 55244.sync@1:103/705 2d75621d
REPLY: 55233.sync@1:103/705 2d74cd6b
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/955e50fea Aug 10 2025 GCC 14.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: PALANTIR
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
-=> Digital Man wrote to Gamgee <=-

 DM>   Re: Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi
 DM>   By: Gamgee to Accession on Fri Nov 07 2025 09:15 pm

 > Yes, understood.  The "put" direction makes good sense to me.  I have a
 > question about the "get" side though - What causes the BBS to know to
 > pack up all the new messages into a QWK packet though?  Does just the
 > act of requesting .qwk cause that to happen?

 DM> Yes, correct.

 > I was thinking I'd
 > have to somehow "tell" the BBS to create the new QWK packet, and *then*
 > grab it with wget/ftp.

 DM> No, it happens on demand. The *.qwk file that appears in the FTP
 DM> directory listing is just a virtual file. A "get" (RETR) of the file
 DM> actually signals the sbbs event thread to create the packet, on demand,
 DM> so there is a bit of delay before the file transfer actually starts
 DM> (which is fine).

Perfect.  Thank you for that explanation, Digital Man!




... Gone crazy, be back later, please leave message.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
 þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 610 700 840 860 880
SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca