Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 42735  |
|  Dumas Walker to Digital Man  |
|  Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi  |
|  11 Nov 25 08:37:11  |
 TZUTC: -0500 MSGID: 74368.sync@723:320/1 2d799487 REPLY: 55266.sync@1:103/705 2d783089 PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.31-Linux master/d39e01091 Nov 03 2025 GCC 12.2.0 COLS: 80 BBSID: CAPCITY2 CHRS: CP437 2 FORMAT: flowed NOTE: Synchronet msgeditor master/123f2d28a Re: Re: NNTP(S) via Thunderbi By: Digital Man to fusion on Mon Nov 10 2025 09:36:39 > > can message areas not be grouped in more than one way? i don't recall. > > perhaps in a(n unpleasant) way where two areas listed in two groups use t > > same files? > > They actually can be, by having a sub-board with the same internal code in m > than one message group. This means you can't use the "internal code prefix" > feature, but it is doable. Some oddity with message scan config / pointers > might occur also, I don't recall. FWIW, I did try that several years ago and it did cause something "odd" to happen. I don't remember what, but it was enough to make me stop doing so. This would have been well over 10 years ago, IIRC. --- þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705) SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 7715 SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 240/1120 5832 263/1 SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124 SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 103/705 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]