TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 55438.sync@1:103/705 2dac1c25
REPLY: 55431.sync@1:103/705 2dac0928
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/6b4a1dc45 Dec 19 2025 MSC 1944
TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Linux master/114c3dfde Dec 19 2025 GCC 12.2.0
COLS: 80
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105
  Re: pros and cons
  By: Morningstarr to Digital Man on Fri Dec 19 2025 05:23 pm

 > Which bbs software is more feature rich?

I think that's too subjective of a question for me to answer.  If Synchronet
has more features, but you (or you users) don't care about or use those
features, you wouldn't care.

 > What type of Internet-integrations can synchronet do that the
 > other two can't?

Here's a complete list of Synchronet's included TCP/IP servers/services:
https://wiki.synchro.net/faq:tcpip#ports

Which ones exactly are or or are not supported by the other two, I don't know
off the top of my head.

I don't think either Major BBS or Wildcat support SSH, for example. For a
complete detailed comparison, you'll probably want to do a little more
research yourself.
-- 
                                            digital man (rob)

This Is Spinal Tap quote #24:
David St. Hubbins: You're a haughty one, saucy Jack.
Norco, CA WX: 61.9øF, 72.0% humidity, 0 mph N wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.33-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 700 840 860 880 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426