Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 42956  |
|  Digital Man to Gamgee  |
|  Re: File Request question  |
|  22 Dec 25 20:44:15  |
 
TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 55532.sync@1:103/705 2db02d0b
REPLY: 55531.sync@1:103/705 2db02055
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/114c3dfde Dec 19 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Linux master/93cefd0e8 Dec 20 2025 GCC 12.2.0
COLS: 80
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105
Re: Re: File Request question
By: Gamgee to Digital Man on Mon Dec 22 2025 08:57 pm
> -=> Digital Man wrote to Gamgee <=-
>
> DM> Re: Re: File Request question
> DM> By: Gamgee to Digital Man on Mon Dec 22 2025 10:40 am
>
> > Thank you also for the new writeup posted on the Wiki for this. I
> > tested that this morning, to my system from a "test point" that I have.
> > It worked properly, but it did result in the file being sent twice,
> > because there ended up being (2) File Requests (.req) sent, for reasons
> > unknown. The requesting system is also running SBBS, if that matters.
> > The second file received just over-wrote the first one, in the
> > "inbound" directory, so no real harm done, but seems off a little.
> > Here's a log snippet of the transaction, from the system that received
> > the two requests:
>
> DM> The sbbsecho.log messages concerning the file request would likely be
> DM> more helpful.
>
> Okay, here is the snippet from the orignating system (the point) from
> that log. It shows only the one file request (00870073.req) being
> generated and sent. Not sure where that other .req file came from in
> the original (binkit) log that I posted. Also, in case it mattered,
> that line complaining about missing 'areas.bbs', I created an empty one
> and repeated the test with the same results.
The "Could not open Area File" error doesn't matter. And the correct way to
suppress that error would be to set echocfg->Paths and Filenames->Area File to
a blank string.
> Also, the timestamp
> difference between these logs is because the sending system is on UTC
> time.
>
> 2025-12-22 15:16:16 Could not open Area File (../data/areas.bbs): No such
> file or directory
> 2025-12-22 15:16:16 Created NetMail (1.msg) from Preem Palver (1:135/115.7)
> to sysop (1:135/115), attr: 0981 (PRIVATE, KILLSENT, LOCAL, FREQ), subject:
> ALLFILES
> 2025-12-22 15:16:16 BSO file request from Preem Palver (1:135/115.7) to
> sysop (1:135/115): ALLFILES
> 2025-12-22 15:16:16 File (../fido/outbound/00870073.req, 0.0KB) for
> 1:135/115 added to BSO/FLO file: ../fido/outbound/00870073.dlo
> 2025-12-22 15:16:16 SBBSecho (PID 46223) exiting with error level 0,
> NetMail(0 imported, 1 exported, 0 packed)
>
> Any clues appreciated, thanks!
Not really any yet. So you only see the second .req filename mentioned in logs
on the receiving system?
--
digital man (rob)
Rush quote #76:
His reserve a quiet defense, riding out the day's events, the river..Tom Sawyer
Norco, CA WX: 63.3øF, 73.0% humidity, 0 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.33-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 700 840 860 880 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]