home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 42956 
 Digital Man to Gamgee 
 Re: File Request question 
 22 Dec 25 20:44:15 
 
TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 55532.sync@1:103/705 2db02d0b
REPLY: 55531.sync@1:103/705 2db02055
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/114c3dfde Dec 19 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Linux master/93cefd0e8 Dec 20 2025 GCC 12.2.0
COLS: 80
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105
  Re: Re: File Request question
  By: Gamgee to Digital Man on Mon Dec 22 2025 08:57 pm

 > -=> Digital Man wrote to Gamgee <=-
 >
 >  DM>   Re: Re: File Request question
 >  DM>   By: Gamgee to Digital Man on Mon Dec 22 2025 10:40 am
 >
 >  > Thank you also for the new writeup posted on the Wiki for this.  I
 >  > tested that this morning, to my system from a "test point" that I have.
 >  > It worked properly, but it did result in the file being sent twice,
 >  > because there ended up being (2) File Requests (.req) sent, for reasons
 >  > unknown.  The requesting system is also running SBBS, if that matters.
 >  > The second file received just over-wrote the first one, in the
 >  > "inbound" directory, so no real harm done, but seems off a little.
 >  > Here's a log snippet of the transaction, from the system that received
 >  > the two requests:
 >
 >  DM> The sbbsecho.log messages concerning the file request would likely be
 >  DM> more helpful.
 >
 > Okay, here is the snippet from the orignating system (the point) from
 > that log.  It shows only the one file request (00870073.req) being
 > generated and sent.  Not sure where that other .req file came from in
 > the original (binkit) log that I posted.  Also, in case it mattered,
 > that line complaining about missing 'areas.bbs', I created an empty one
 > and repeated the test with the same results.

The "Could not open Area File" error doesn't matter. And the correct way to
suppress that error would be to set echocfg->Paths and Filenames->Area File to
a blank string.

 > Also, the timestamp
 > difference between these logs is because the sending system is on UTC
 > time.
 >
 > 2025-12-22 15:16:16 Could not open Area File (../data/areas.bbs): No such
 > file or directory
 > 2025-12-22 15:16:16 Created NetMail (1.msg) from Preem Palver (1:135/115.7)
 > to sysop (1:135/115), attr: 0981 (PRIVATE, KILLSENT, LOCAL, FREQ), subject:
 > ALLFILES
 > 2025-12-22 15:16:16 BSO file request from Preem Palver (1:135/115.7) to
 > sysop (1:135/115): ALLFILES
 > 2025-12-22 15:16:16 File (../fido/outbound/00870073.req, 0.0KB) for
 > 1:135/115 added to BSO/FLO file: ../fido/outbound/00870073.dlo
 > 2025-12-22 15:16:16 SBBSecho (PID 46223) exiting with error level 0,
 > NetMail(0 imported, 1 exported, 0 packed)
 >
 > Any clues appreciated, thanks!

Not really any yet. So you only see the second .req filename mentioned in logs
on the receiving system?
-- 
                                            digital man (rob)

Rush quote #76:
His reserve a quiet defense, riding out the day's events, the river..Tom Sawyer
Norco, CA WX: 63.3øF, 73.0% humidity, 0 mph ENE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.33-Linux
 * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 700 840 860 880 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca