Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 42976  |
|  Denn to Nightfox  |
|  pros and cons  |
|  24 Dec 25 23:12:30  |
 
TZUTC: -0700
MSGID: 55554.sync@1:103/705 2db2e5f2
REPLY: 55545.sync@1:103/705 2db244ae
PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
TID: SBBSecho 3.33-Linux master/3fa76ba1d Dec 21 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: OUTWEST
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (DCT style)
Re: pros and cons
By: Nightfox to Denn on Wed Dec 24 2025 10:25 am
De>> I would say both are considered programming.
Ni> Yeah, I feel like both can be considered programming. There have been
Ni> entire programs written in Python, for instances, which has traditionally
Ni> been thought of as a scripting language. The lines are definitely blurred.
Ni> But when it comes to things like writing Windows batch files or *NIX shell
Ni> scripts, I do tend to call those 'scripting', since in those cases, I'm
Ni> usually trying to automate something and it isn't compiled.
Why Batch feels different
Batch files are essentially just a list of commands you would normally type
into the Command Prompt, saved into a file so you don't have to type them
twice.
When you added variables and logic, you were actually using the fundamental
building blocks of computer science:
Sequence: Doing things in order.
Selection: Using IF statements to make decisions.
Iteration: Using FOR loops to repeat tasks.
Even if it doesn't feel like "programming" because you weren't building a GUI
or a mobile app, you were effectively performing systems administration. You
were the arcitect of a workflow, which is a massive step up from being a
casual user.
Definatley not high level programming, but could still be considered a form
of programming.
... White dwarf seeks red giant for binary relationship.
---
þ Synchronet þ the Outwest BBS - outwest.synchro.net - Home of BBSBASE 6.0
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 700 840 860 880 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]