Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 43114  |
|  Digital Man to Mortar  |
|  Message Base Question  |
|  18 Jan 26 17:07:44  |
 
TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 55701.sync@1:103/705 2dd39375
REPLY: 55699.sync@1:103/705 2dd36659
PID: Synchronet 3.21b-Linux master/9af0a2196 Jan 17 2026 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.34-Linux master/9af0a2196 Jan 17 2026 GCC 12.2.0
COLS: 80
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105
Re: Message Base Question
By: Mortar to Digital Man on Sun Jan 18 2026 03:52 pm
> Re: Message Base Question
> By: Digital Man to Tom Moore on Sat Jan 17 2026 19:28:34
>
> > The date/time stamps on messages aren't very accurate (especially
> > considering different timezones).
>
> Funny this comes up. I have my msg. pointers set to see msgs. for just the
> last six months. I was reading a bunch of msgs. yesterday and amongst the
> 2026 msgs. came several 2020 msgs, then back to the present. Weird.
Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on
their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written
(which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not weird
really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it happens a lot.
--
digital man (rob)
This Is Spinal Tap quote #12:
Nigel Tufnel: Well, I don't know - wh-wh-... what're the hours?
Norco, CA WX: 72.2øF, 36.0% humidity, 5 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.34-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 17 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187
SEEN-BY: 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/0 1 215 601 700 840 860 880 226/30
SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 902/26 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 218/700 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]