Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 43118  |
|  Digital Man to Mortar  |
|  Good Pointers  |
|  18 Jan 26 19:19:50  |
 
TZUTC: -0800
MSGID: 55705.sync@1:103/705 2dd3b26f
REPLY: 55702.sync@1:103/705 2dd39796
PID: Synchronet 3.21b-Linux master/9af0a2196 Jan 17 2026 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.34-Linux master/9af0a2196 Jan 17 2026 GCC 12.2.0
COLS: 80
BBSID: VERT
CHRS: CP437 2
FORMAT: flowed
NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105
Re: Good Pointers
By: Mortar to Digital Man on Sun Jan 18 2026 07:21 pm
> Re: Message Base Question
> By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44
>
> > Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on
> > their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written
> > (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not
> > weird really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it
> > happens a lot.
>
> Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more
> sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more
> meaningful to the user.
Except that messages are imported or sorted by "written date".
--
digital man (rob)
Steven Wright quote #27:
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Norco, CA WX: 66.0øF, 36.0% humidity, 2 mph NW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.34-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 7715
SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110
SEEN-BY: 229/112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 705 240/1120 5832
SEEN-BY: 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31
SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58
SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 384 410 414 418 420 422 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26
SEEN-BY: 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 103/705 280/464 633/280 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]