Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 43119  |
|  Martin Kazmaier to Mortar  |
|  Good Pointers  |
|  18 Jan 26 20:07:00  |
 MSGID: 1:340/1101 01073638 REPLY: 55702.sync@1:103/705 2dd39796 PID: THE READER V4.50 [freeware] NOTE: IceEdit 2.35 K96741 TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 43288 Mo> Re: Message Base Question Mo> By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44 Mo> > Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based Mo> on Mo> > their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly Mo> written Mo> > (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not Mo> weird Mo> > really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it Mo> happens a Mo> > lot. Mo> Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more Mo> sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more Mo> meaningful to the user. I don't know how that would work, every message area would constantly have to be reindexed if that were the case... -- Shurato, Sysop Shurato's Heavenly Sphere (ssh, telnet, pop3, ftp,nntp, ,wss) (Ports 22,23,110,21,119,999) *** THE READER V4.50 [freeware] --- * Origin: Shurato's Heavenly Sphere telnet://shsbbs.net (1:340/1101) SEEN-BY: 105/81 106/201 128/10 187 129/14 153/7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 317 400 426 428 470 700 SEEN-BY: 229/705 266/512 291/111 300/6 320/219 322/757 340/0 101 200 SEEN-BY: 340/400 800 1100 1101 342/200 396/45 60 460/58 633/280 712/848 SEEN-BY: 902/26 5075/35 PATH: 340/1101 400 128/187 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]