Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.philosophy.humanism    |    Humanism in the modern world    |    22,193 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,230 of 22,193    |
|    Gregory Allen-Anderson to Joseph H    |
|    Re: Humanism in 2006    |
|    19 Feb 06 22:01:34    |
      From: barrysremovebeau@yahoo.com              Joseph H wrote:              >       > No, it is not possible to determine anything of this nature. There are       > no external criteria. It is, however, possible to agree on something.       > It is possible to decide something. Every constitution is a decision       > anyway. My point is that as our knowledge increases and as we - slowly       > - wipe away the detritus and illusions of the past our decisions and       > our choices will be that much more informed. We will choose what kind       > of society we want for humans in the light of a far more comprehensive       > view of what human society entails and, indeed, of the provenance and       > the prospective future of human society.       >              I agree with all of that.                     >> Closer to what?       >       > To a complete understanding of the nature and provenance of our       > presence on the planet and to a more informed understanding of what       > might lie ahead.       >       I don't disagree with this either, though it doesn't seem terribly       closely related to morality. Anyway, our previous disagreement seems to       be more misunderstanding than disagreement.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca