home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.philosophy.humanism      Humanism in the modern world      22,193 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 20,623 of 22,193   
   Mark Marklar 2.0 - The Hyper-Intell to scientist"   
   Re: With Whom Does the Burden of Proof L   
   20 Jun 06 15:52:13   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, rec.sport.pro-wrestling, alt.flame.jesus.christ   
   XPost: talk.atheism   
   From: IQ@158.com   
      
   On 20 Jun 2006 05:14:27 -0700, "World's most respected social   
   scientist"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >Ærchie wrote:   
   >> The curfew had been lifted and the gamblin' wheel shut down, Anyone with   
   >> any sense had already left town. Yet  World's most respected social   
   >> scientist  was standin' in the doorway saying:   
   >>   
   >> >   
   >> >Lukas Mariman wrote:   
   >> >> "World's most respected social scientist"    
   schreef   
   >> >> in bericht news:1150753725.184999.8190@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >> > With biographical info, the burden of proof is on the doubter. For   
   >> >> > example, if one person claims to have a degree in criminal justice and   
   >> >> > another person doubts it, it is up to the person doubting to prove that   
   >> >> > the person does not have a degree.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Well, that is plain *weird*.   
   >> >   
   >> >How so? In this NG, I have seen many atheists doubt that certain   
   >> >theists went to college. But, those theists did go to college. They   
   >> >have diplomas and degrees from those same colleges. They (the theists)   
   >> >say that they have degrees and have been to university and/or college.   
   >> >   
   >> >They are just trying to counter your doubts. It is up to YOU to prove   
   >> >that they never once set foot in a university or college, for example.   
   >>   
   >> I quite agree with Chris.   
   >>   
   >> It is up to the doubters to prove a statement false.   
   >>   
   >> Just as it is up to Chris to prove that I am not his guardian angel and   
   >> that I have messages from God for him.   
   >   
   >You are an atheist. Therefore, you cannot be my guardian angel. Even if   
   >you were, where were you when my adopted sister was suffering from   
   >Tuberculosis and where were you when I was suffering from Bronchiis?   
      
   Waiting for you to try to use something besides your Capitol Gold Visa   
   card to buy something.   
   -   
      
   You just got MARKed the fuck out!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca