Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.philosophy.humanism    |    Humanism in the modern world    |    22,193 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 20,913 of 22,193    |
|    David V. to darwinist@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Evolutionist Humanism    |
|    06 Oct 06 06:22:09    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, aus.politics       From: spam@hotmail.com              darwinist@gmail.com wrote:       > David V. wrote:       >       >> darwinist wrote:       >>       >>> David V. wrote:       >>>       >>>       >>>> darwinist@gmail.com wrote:       >>>>       >>>>       >>>>> That our genes have made it this far says a lot about       >>>>> them. Not one of our ancestors died before       >>>>> reproducing, in the many millions of generations       >>>>> between the first life-form and our present body, this       >>>>> has involved a lot of different situations and       >>>>> environments. You might say we are relatively       >>>>> well-tested.       >>>>>       >>>>> Unique among earth's life, humans have a strategic       >>>>> self-awareness. That is, we can see what our mind is       >>>>> doing and use that information to refine our       >>>>> strategies. We can see what other people's minds are       >>>>> doing as well. In neither case are our explanations       >>>>> perfect, but thinking about minds, being mindful of       >>>>> thoughts, at least sometimes, has proven useful to the       >>>>> gene-pool.       >>>>>       >>>>> The human condition, then, is a lifelong education in       >>>>> how to make use of the human condition. We have a       >>>>> sophisticated set of decision-making faculties to       >>>>> serve us, and we can consider them at the strategic       >>>>> level. Even so, people die every minute after several       >>>>> million generations of unbroken reproductive success,       >>>>> so we can't assume anything out of life, except this       >>>>> education.       >>>>>       >>>>> We can generally learn a lot better if we are willing       >>>>> to revise our answers and plans, rather than grabbing       >>>>> any solid piece of certainty within reach and bashing       >>>>> our enemies on the head with it. They're not enemies       >>>>> when you realise you're in the same class, and can       >>>>> help each other to learn.       >>>>       >>>> Then maybe you can learn a bit about biology? We are not       >>>> alone in self-awareness.       >>>       >>> Can you be more specific? What other animal can abstract a       >>> plan from its concrete specifics and examine the logic as       >>> a thing in itself? What other animal can make up fiction       >>> on purpose to illustrate a general point? What other       >>> animal can lie creatively, rather than simply hide       >>> something? Koko the gorilla knew she was sad when her       >>> kitty died, but that doesn't mean she could understand the       >>> causal-relationship.       >>       >> I could go into specifics, but I don't have the time to take       >> you through several upper level biology classes.       >       > So I'll just take your word for it then, shall I?              Why the double standard? You want us to take your word as it is.       Maybe you could do a little studying on your own. Start with some       basic biology and them some ethology.              >> I also sense a game of shifting goal posts, and some plurium       >> interrogationum, going on so I am reluctant to put much       >> effort into a reply.       >       >       > "I sense a game...", "some plurium interrogationum...", you       > must have a high-opinion of your own opinion....              Plonk.              --       Dave              "Sacred cows make the best hamburger." Mark Twain.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca