XPost: talk.atheism, alt.religion, alt.religion.christian
From: vigyazat@hotmail.co.uk
From Christopher A.Lee :
> So what if I can't type?
>
> But it gives you a dishonest excuse to ignore fact.
Chris, you and I both know from previous squabbles that your standard MO
is to scream dishonesty regardless of what your opponent says.
Nevertheless, if you can actually point to a fact I've ignored - and I
mean *ignored*, Chris, rather than answered in a way you don't
personally agree with and approve of - then by all means cite it here.
>>And yeah, it's relevant. You rationalise your anger and your hatred
>>based on your conviction that you're righteous and just - which is
>>exactly how religious fanatics justify theirs. The problem is the
>>same: it's just the excuse that's different. Slander's evil when
>>theists do it; it's an acceptable means to an end when atheists do it.
>> Imposition is evil when it's "you must believe": but when it's "you
>>must not believe", that's just peachy.
>
> Nobody is doing that, liar, except theists.
Personally, I'd call the blanket accusations you and your fellow angry
anti-theists frequently level at all religious people, based as they are
on your personal narrow views on Christianity, pretty slanderous; and I
don't see much leeway for choice in the hatred you express for people
who don't believe as you do. But hey, you keep on believing you're the
righteous one - and the religious fanatics will keep on believing the
same thing about themselves. If you need to accuse me of lying and
dishonesty in order to avoid facing up to that... well, as mentioned
above, it won't be anything new.
> And you pretend you don't understand why you are called the liar and
> idiot you show yourself to be.
I know exactly why I'm called a liar and and idiot by you: it's because
it's easier for you than actually addressing the points I'm making.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
