XPost: alt.agnosticism, alt.atheism, talk.religion.misc   
   From: a202010@lycos.com-   
      
   Timothy Sutter wrote:   
      
   > this creature is said to be a juvenile   
   > and therefore not fully formed, and so,   
   > some of it's features may very naturally   
   > distinguish itself from other fully formed lemurs,   
   > and not just be a different sort of lemur.   
      
   > another problem is that this creature was found in 1983,   
   > and hung on a wall for some 23 years before anyone   
   > decided it was a curious find, and over that time,   
   > the integrity of the -site- is undoubtedly tainted,   
   > and so, the absolute timeline is questionable.   
      
   > stills seems one must assume common ancestry -first-,   
      
   > and then say, "this is that"   
      
   > i may have some other problems with it...   
      
      
   one thing, this creature, being a juvenile,   
   and having died, quite probably, before ever   
   having produced any offspring at all,   
   is not likely the progenitor of -anything-.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)