ef0c53e4
XPost: uk.philosophy.humanism, alt.society.conservatism, alt.society.liberalism
From: mlwi@swipnet.se
"LifeBinge" skrev i meddelandet news:4c94d
07-f601-4aea-a700-ced3b2f6ff51@e20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>> If the genetic characteristics of society changes, society will also
>> change. This is so obvious, but you prefer to turn a blind eye to it,
>> because you want to sleep well at night. You think only about yourself
>> and don't care for future generations.
>>
>> Mats- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> If the genetic characteristics of the society change, it has nothing
> to do with the genetics has nothing to do with beliefs, If the
> cultural characterics of society change, the society changes.. just
> because Obama made president, doesnt mean they's all blacks down there
> now or wannabe's... society may change based on his beleif/culture,
> not on his genetics..
>
> The more "devoloped" the society, the more poluted it becomes, these
> "lesser" cultures have something western/europeon culture has lost
> long ago, natual sustainability without parasitic/destructiv behavior
> towards our home/earth, they live free.. we live by obedience,
> Developed societies may be technologicaly advanced, but are also
> spiritually lost.
>
> Genetics has nothing to do with deciding the society's structure, its
> the belief system, thier conditioning which is not derrived from
> genetics but social development/experience.. You guys are obsessed
> with the material/physical and forget about the other side of
> things..
>
> I agree that each race/people/culture should have their own land with
> their own laws, but no people should have to restrict themselves to
> locals based on race, culture on the other hand, keep it there, share
> but do not impose, embrace. Western culture is bent on imposing and
> is poluted beyond comprehension.. Which is the "Lesser culture"
> Western or that of pure naturality.
>
I think that race is more on the inside than on the outside. People
who think in terms of "racial purity" are only fixated on outside
characteristics, and accomplishments. But, of course, genetics always
plays a role. Blacks in the U.S. have, on average, 30% White
admixture, I believe. Their IQ averages 85. Sub-Saharan Blacks average
71-75, which is significantly lower.
So, if a white person marries a black person, he/she should know that
the children are likely to be less intelligent than if he/she marries
a white person. It is only fair that they should know this. It doesn't
matter if the Black person is intelligent. Due to the law of
regression the children will tend towards average IQ. Why should we
withhold such information? In all other circumstances it would be
regarded a scandal if authorities withheld the information that
children will become less intelligent. It also has a bearing on the
future economical success of the nations. Average IQ is coupled to BNP
per capita (Lynn & Vanhanen). In fact, our civilization is dependent
on intelligent people who will come up with new solution to the energy
problem, environmental problems, etc. If we put our valuable gentic
advantages to waste, it might prove devastating.
In my article "An Intrusion of Matriarchal Consciousness" I argue
that..."Broadly speaking, there is in the "white" culture a strife
toward higher accomplishment, an advancement of consciousness, a
movement of emancipation. But among certain ethnic groups one can
detect a general movement toward the other end, namely to belong in an
unconscious community, to swim with the tide. The psychic gradients, I
would argue, go in different directions."
http://home7.swipnet.se/~w-73784/matriarchal.htm
Mats
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
