XPost: talk.atheism, alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism   
   XPost: alt.recovery.catholicism   
      
   On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:24:04 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:26:15 -0400, PATRICK    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:34:55 -0500, Free Lunch    
   >>wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:17:27 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:02:22 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>In article <19bmp9hme2n7tg15gvfe17n76r9t4bnfj1@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >>>>>wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:27:57 -0230, David Dalton    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> >In article , mur@.not.   
   >>>>>> >wrote:   
   >>>>>> >   
   >>>>>> >> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:56:34 -0230, David Dalton    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> >> >4.  mystic "live" sparks as opposed to dead normal static ones   
   >>>>>> >>   
   >>>>>> >>     Where?   
   >>>>>> >   
   >>>>>> >The first one was in the center of my inner right forearm.   
   >>>>>> >I was barefoot at the time and the air wasn't very dry and   
   >>>>>> >I was standing in the middle of the room well away from   
   >>>>>> >any metal.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>     How long did it last and what did it do?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>It didn't last long, maybe half a second, and it zapped   
   >>>>>me, but I didn't see any light.   Also it felt more   
   >>>>>alive, like a hummingbird, than a usual static zap.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Well if a deity had something to do with it then there doesn't seem   
   like   
   >>>>there's much point in trying to pretend otherwise.   
   >>>   
   >>>Why do you pretend that there are deities when there is no reason to   
   >>>accept such a silly claim?   
   >>   
   >>Why do you deny the existence of something you can't understand?   
   >   
   >I tentatively deny the existence of everything that is posited without   
   >any supporting evidence   
      
       AGAIN I present you with a basic challenge that has so far completely   
   defeated every one of you atheists so entirely that none of you have yet been   
   able to attempt to address it:   
      
   If God does exist WHAT type of evidence do atheists think there "should be"?   
   WHERE do atheists think the evidence they beg for "should be"? WHY do atheists   
   think it "should be" to God's benefit for him to provide us with whatever   
   particular evidence they keep whining about?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)