XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: olrik666@yahoo.com   
      
   Le 2014-06-24 11:05, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >      For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence" of   
   > God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to try   
   to   
   > explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't even   
   > address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed evidence   
   > "should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it   
   "should   
   > be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at all   
   what   
   > they think they think, or even what they want other people to think they   
   think   
   > they think. It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire group of   
   > atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions, nor can they   
   as a   
   > group figure out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is it sad?   
   > Because it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were trying   
   to   
   > talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.   
      
   It looks like you're asking us to provide you with an excuse *not* to   
   believe in «god».   
      
   --   
   Olrik   
   aa #1981   
   EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)