XPost: alt.atheism   
   From: someone@somewhere.invalid   
      
   On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:19 -0400, mur wrote:   
      
   > For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence" of   
   > God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to   
   > try to explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they   
   > can't even address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the   
   > supposed evidence "should be" they again are helpless. When challenged   
   > to explain WHY it "should be" to God's benefit to provide us with it   
   > AGAIN they have no clue at all what they think they think, or even what   
   > they want other people to think they think they think. It is certainly a   
   > sad sad thing that within this entire group of atheists none of their   
   > small minds can answer these questions, nor can they as a group figure   
   > out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is it sad? Because   
   > it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were trying to   
   > talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.   
      
   Fair enough.  You tell me exactly what testable attributes you think your   
   god has, and I will tell you what tests would be needed to demonstrate   
   his existence.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)