XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:15:33 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   .   
   >In article , mur@.not.   
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>     For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence" of   
   >> God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to try   
   >> to   
   >> explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't even   
   >> address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed   
   evidence   
   >> "should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it   
   >> "should   
   >> be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at all   
   >> what   
   >> they think they think, or even what they want other people to think they   
   >> think   
   >> they think. It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire group of   
   >> atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions, nor can they   
   >> as a   
   >> group figure out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is it   
   sad?   
   >> Because it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were trying   
   >> to   
   >> talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.   
   >   
   >If God exists, perhaps It likes diversity and hence is   
   >not providing evidence for any one viewpoint.   
      
       My interpretation is somewhat different....that he does provide evidence   
   for   
   a number of different viewpoints which is why there are believers in a number   
   of   
   different religious faiths. Notice that the atheists don't like any evidence   
   there is and continue to insist there is none in spite of the fact there's   
   obviously enough to persuade billions of people that God does exist, yet they   
   have no clue at all what sort of evidence they believe there should be if God   
   does exist. Notice that not only do they have no clue at all, but they can't   
   even attempt to pretend to have any clue at all. The challenge to try to   
   explain   
   what they think they think defeats them absolutely and entirely as they   
   demonstrate consistently.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)