XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:05:32 -0400, James <1rilu2@windstream.net> wrote:   
   .   
   >mur@.not.   
   >>    For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence" of   
   >>God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to try   
   to   
   >>explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't even   
   >>address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed evidence   
   >>"should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it   
   "should   
   >>be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at all   
   what   
   >>they think they think, or even what they want other people to think they   
   think   
   >>they think. It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire group of   
   >>atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions, nor can they   
   as a   
   >>group figure out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is it sad?   
   >>Because it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were trying   
   to   
   >>talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.   
   >   
   >They are stubborn rascals. When a true scientist looks at evidence, he   
   >will accept any logical evidence seen, whether or not it agrees with   
   >his personal beliefs. But atheists are apparently a different breed.   
   >   
   >They will only accept evidence that doesn't interfere with their   
   >personal beliefs.   
      
       That would explain why they deny the existence of the evidence that has   
   persuaded billions of people to believe God does exist.   
      
   >Thus they think they are 'stacking the deck' in   
   >their favor. They think it is a 'win, win' situation. But they are   
   >actually the losers, blocking out real truths.   
      
       They certainly try to hide from anything that threatens the security of   
   their tiny little mental safety zone. It's cognitive dissonance for sure, and   
   whether or not Satan does exist their behavior is evidence of Satan's influence   
   on their feeble minds.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)