XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:30:45 -0500, Don Kresch  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:19 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>    For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence" of   
   >>God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to try   
   to   
   >>explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't even   
   >>address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed evidence   
   >>"should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it   
   "should   
   >>be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at all   
   what   
   >>they think they think, or even what they want other people to think they   
   think   
   >>they think.   
   >   
   >	That's not our job   
      
       LOL! It's not your job to try explaining what you want people to think you   
   think. Hilarious!!!   
      
   >, bubba. We don't have to do your homework for you.   
      
       I TOLD YOU that you don't have any clue what you think you think....that   
   you   
   have no idea what you think you're trying to talk about. I figured it out and   
   TOLD YOU. Now you have confirmed that I'm correct. It IS your job but you can   
   NOT do it. BUT! If you would like to try to pretend that I'm not correct and   
   you   
   really can do your job then again I challenge you to try explaining:   
      
   WHAT sort of evidence do you think "should be", WHERE you think it "should be"   
   and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit to provide it if he does   
   exist.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)