XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.recovery.catholicism   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:32:03 +1000, felix_unger  wrote:   
      
   >On 25-June-2014 12:34 PM, David Dalton wrote:   
   >   
   >> In article <0v4jq9pegu8jsja3ohufh7hb9s9hlmga5n@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:24:04 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:26:15 -0400, PATRICK    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:34:55 -0500, Free Lunch    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:17:27 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:02:22 -0230, David Dalton    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>>> In article <19bmp9hme2n7tg15gvfe17n76r9t4bnfj1@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:27:57 -0230, David Dalton    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> In article , mur@.not.   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:56:34 -0230, David Dalton    
   >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 4.  mystic "live" sparks as opposed to dead normal static ones   
   >>>>>>>>>>>      Where?   
   >>>>>>>>>> The first one was in the center of my inner right forearm.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I was barefoot at the time and the air wasn't very dry and   
   >>>>>>>>>> I was standing in the middle of the room well away from   
   >>>>>>>>>> any metal.   
   >>>>>>>>>      How long did it last and what did it do?   
   >>>>>>>> It didn't last long, maybe half a second, and it zapped   
   >>>>>>>> me, but I didn't see any light.   Also it felt more   
   >>>>>>>> alive, like a hummingbird, than a usual static zap.   
   >>>>>>>     Well if a deity had something to do with it then there doesn't seem   
   >>>>>>>     like   
   >>>>>>> there's much point in trying to pretend otherwise.   
   >>>>>> Why do you pretend that there are deities when there is no reason to   
   >>>>>> accept such a silly claim?   
   >>>>> Why do you deny the existence of something you can't understand?   
   >>>> I tentatively deny the existence of everything that is posited without   
   >>>> any supporting evidence   
   >>>      AGAIN I present you with a basic challenge that has so far completely   
   >>> defeated every one of you atheists so entirely that none of you have yet   
   been   
   >>> able to attempt to address it:   
   >>>   
   >>> If God does exist WHAT type of evidence do atheists think there "should   
   be"?   
   >>> WHERE do atheists think the evidence they beg for "should be"? WHY do   
   >>> atheists   
   >>> think it "should be" to God's benefit for him to provide us with whatever   
   >>> particular evidence they keep whining about?   
   >> I think that God, or gods, like diversity, and hence are not   
   >> providing evidence for any one viewpoint.   
   >>   
   >   
   >it's simply an atheist lie that there's no evidence for God's existence.   
      
   You know that you have absolutely no evidence that any gods exist.   
      
   >what they really demand is proof.   
      
   No, we merely demand evidence. You make excuses for your total lack of   
   evidence and then call us liars for pointing out that your religious   
   claims are indefensible.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)