XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.sceptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 27-June-2014 6:58 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:04:15 -0230, David Dalton  wrote:   
   > ..   
   >> In article <0v4jq9pegu8jsja3ohufh7hb9s9hlmga5n@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:24:04 -0500, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:26:15 -0400, PATRICK    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:34:55 -0500, Free Lunch    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:17:27 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 01:02:22 -0230, David Dalton    
   wrote:   
   >>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>>> In article <19bmp9hme2n7tg15gvfe17n76r9t4bnfj1@4ax.com>, mur@.not.   
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 00:27:57 -0230, David Dalton    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> In article , mur@.not.   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 02:56:34 -0230, David Dalton    
   >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 4.  mystic "live" sparks as opposed to dead normal static ones   
   >>>>>>>>>>>      Where?   
   >>>>>>>>>> The first one was in the center of my inner right forearm.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I was barefoot at the time and the air wasn't very dry and   
   >>>>>>>>>> I was standing in the middle of the room well away from   
   >>>>>>>>>> any metal.   
   >>>>>>>>>      How long did it last and what did it do?   
   >>>>>>>> It didn't last long, maybe half a second, and it zapped   
   >>>>>>>> me, but I didn't see any light.   Also it felt more   
   >>>>>>>> alive, like a hummingbird, than a usual static zap.   
   >>>>>>>     Well if a deity had something to do with it then there doesn't seem   
   >>>>>>>     like   
   >>>>>>> there's much point in trying to pretend otherwise.   
   >>>>>> Why do you pretend that there are deities when there is no reason to   
   >>>>>> accept such a silly claim?   
   >>>>> Why do you deny the existence of something you can't understand?   
   >>>> I tentatively deny the existence of everything that is posited without   
   >>>> any supporting evidence   
   >>>      AGAIN I present you with a basic challenge that has so far completely   
   >>> defeated every one of you atheists so entirely that none of you have yet   
   been   
   >>> able to attempt to address it:   
   >>>   
   >>> If God does exist WHAT type of evidence do atheists think there "should   
   be"?   
   >>> WHERE do atheists think the evidence they beg for "should be"? WHY do   
   >>> atheists   
   >>> think it "should be" to God's benefit for him to provide us with whatever   
   >>> particular evidence they keep whining about?   
   >> I think that God, or gods, like diversity, and hence are not   
   >> providing evidence for any one viewpoint.   
   >      It's clear that they provide enough evidence to persuade billions of   
   people   
   > of their existence, if they or He or whatever do/does exist.   
      
   I caught the tail end of a conversation at a party last weekend. this   
   chap was saying that scientists are unable to explain why cells 'know'   
   what their 'place' is in the human body. ie. why one cell 'knows' it's a   
   brain cell and another a kidney cell, etc.,   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   election results explained: http://ausnet.info/pics/labor_wins2.jpg   
   “People sleep peacefully in their beds only because rough   
   men stand ready to do violence on their behalf”   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)