XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic
XPost: alt.christnet
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:09:45 +1000, felix_unger wrote:
.
>On 03-July-2014 1:27 AM, mur@.not. wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:27:14 -0500, monkey wrote:
>> ..
>>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:59:52 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:02:23 -0500, monkey wrote:
>>>> .
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:19 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding
"evidence" of
>>>>>> God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged
to try to
>>>>>> explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't
even
>>>>>> address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed
evidence
>>>>>> "should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it
"should
>>>>>> be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at
all what
>>>>>> they think they think, or even what they want other people to think
they think
>>>>>> they think. It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire
group of
>>>>>> atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions, nor can
they as a
>>>>>> group figure out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is
it sad?
>>>>>> Because it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were
trying to
>>>>>> talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.
>>>>> No atheists dont demand evidence
>>>> That's a blatant lie. What did you think you could gain by telling
such a
>>>> blatant lie as that, do you have any idea?
>>> no it is not a lie.
>> It's a blatant lie and the only question is why you told it.
>
>the stuff he comes up with just ludicrous. his thinking is really
>scrambled. just about every post here is some atheist demanding
>evidence, and denying there is any
Yes, in this particular case I don't believe even he could be quite as
stupid as he's claiming to be.
>>> What you dont understand is atheists like to fuck
>>> with theists and say the words "prove it" for 2 reasons. 1 we just
>>> like fucking with you idiot people and 2 we already know there is no
>>> evidence but we do like a good laugh when a theists runs around in
>>> circles trying so desperately to find it (usually finding something
>>> they dont understand and creating lies about to support thier
>>> positions, yet the truth is revealed eventually and the lies all
>>> cleared up and shown for what they are as evidenced by the supossed
>>> finding of noahs ark)
>> All the reported miracles associated with Jesus are evidence and for
all you
>> know they actually happened which would make them very strong TRUE
evidence. If
>> they didn't happen they're still evidence but false evidence. You might
actually
>> be too stupid to comprehend that, but it's true even if you are too stupid
to
>> get it.
>
>so true. they just can't get even the most simple and basic things
>right. or else they simply don't want to.
Notice that the challenge to try to explain what they think they're trying
to talk about has defeated every one of them so entirely that they can't even
attempt to address it. The "best" they've been able to do is try to wuss off
and
say that they don't need to know what they think they're trying to talk
about...LOL...but the "burden" is on us to tell them what they think they're
trying to talk about. Again describing their position is hilarious. The very
few
horribly pitiful attempts these idiots have tried to make have all been exactly
the same thing...to say they want to see lost limbs grow back. One of the
morons
even specified that....LOL!!!...it should happen in five seconds. In regards to
God they truly have the mentality of very young children and not one of them is
able to consider the possibility of his existence in any realistic way.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
