home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.philosophy.humanism      Humanism in the modern world      22,193 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 21,695 of 22,193   
   mur@.not. to monkey   
   Re: SAD defeat of the atheist community    
   08 Jul 14 12:02:38   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 15:48:57 -0500, monkey wrote:   
   .   
   >On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 11:27:03 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:27:14 -0500, monkey wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:59:52 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:02:23 -0500, monkey wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:05:19 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>    For how long have atheists been begging for and demanding "evidence"   
   of   
   >>>>>>God's existence? For quite a while, we know that. Yet when challenged to   
   try to   
   >>>>>>explain WHAT sort of evidence they think "should be" where, they can't   
   even   
   >>>>>>address the challenge. When challenged to explain WHERE the supposed   
   evidence   
   >>>>>>"should be" they again are helpless. When challenged to explain WHY it   
   "should   
   >>>>>>be" to God's benefit to provide us with it AGAIN they have no clue at   
   all what   
   >>>>>>they think they think, or even what they want other people to think they   
   think   
   >>>>>>they think. It is certainly a sad sad thing that within this entire   
   group of   
   >>>>>>atheists none of their small minds can answer these questions, nor can   
   they as a   
   >>>>>>group figure out what they think they're trying to talk about. Why is it   
   sad?   
   >>>>>>Because it would be interesting to learn what they thought they were   
   trying to   
   >>>>>>talk about IF they had any idea themselves. We've seen that they don't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>No atheists dont demand evidence   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    That's a blatant lie. What did you think you could gain by telling   
   such a   
   >>>>blatant lie as that, do you have any idea?   
   >>>   
   >>>no it is not a lie.   
   >>   
   >>    It's a blatant lie and the only question is why you told it.   
   >>   
   >>>What you dont understand is atheists like to fuck   
   >>>with theists and say the words "prove it" for 2 reasons. 1 we just   
   >>>like fucking with you idiot people and 2 we already know there is no   
   >>>evidence but we do like a good laugh when a theists runs around in   
   >>>circles trying so desperately to find it (usually finding something   
   >>>they dont understand and creating lies about to support thier   
   >>>positions, yet the truth is revealed eventually and the lies all   
   >>>cleared up and shown for what they are as evidenced by the supossed   
   >>>finding of noahs ark)   
   >>   
   >>    All the reported miracles associated with Jesus are evidence and for all   
   you   
   >>know they actually happened which would make them very strong TRUE evidence.   
   If   
   >>they didn't happen they're still evidence but false evidence. You might   
   actually   
   >>be too stupid to comprehend that, but it's true even if you are too stupid to   
   >>get it.   
   >>   
   >>>so if you have any more theist lies about god existing then please   
   >>>tell us so that we can all have a big laugh at just how fucking stupid   
   >>>you really are   
   >>   
   >>    Why don't you tell us how you think you could possibly have found out   
   >>whether or not God exists?   
   >>   
   >>>>>oof your faries. Atheists dont want   
   >>>>>or even need any evidence that there is or is not a god. Atheists know   
   >>>>>that there is no god except the one that has formed out of delusion   
   >>>>>that only lives inside your head.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    The only way you've said you could have found out if that's true or   
   not is   
   >>>>by a decoder ring you got in the mail:   
   >>>   
   >>>yeah that was  funny huh...   
   >>   
   >>    There was nothing at all funny about it. It was extremely stupid, but so   
   >>stupid that there was no humor associated with it at all. It also clearly   
   >>revealed that you have no idea what you think you're trying to talk about   
   when   
   >>you try to pretend you somehow could have found out if God does not exist.   
   You   
   >>reveal that every time you're challenged on it in fact.   
   >>   
   >>>>"I "found out" I got my decoder ring in the mail one day and used   
   >>>>it when I looked at the bible and it said god was not real" - bilgat@m.nu   
   >>>   
   >>>That was an awsome quote, thanks for that bit of history. You know you   
   >>>keep putting these little quotes of mine up but all they actually do   
   >>>is make you look more like an idiot and make me look better and better   
   >>   
   >>    LOL!!! I doubt even your atheist brothers are stupid enough to believe   
   that.   
   >>You might possibly be, but I don't believe anyone else posting here honestly   
   is   
   >>that stupid besides possibly yourself.   
   >>   
   >>>>Are you still insisting that's the only way you could "know" God doesn't   
   exist?   
   >>>>Or would you now like to try pretending there are other ways you could have   
   >>>>found out also?   
   >>>   
   >>>LOL that is so damn funny. I am just using your "magic"   
   >>>   
   >>>YOU IDIOT you are so fucking stupid you cant seem to understand very   
   >>>much at all   
   >>   
   >>    I understand enough to have gotten you to prove you haven't got any idea   
   >>what you think you're trying to talk about. It is AGAIN revealing you to be a   
   >>blatantly stupid liar.   
   >   
   >oh wow   
      
       It's impressive, but you do it VERY frequently.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca