XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:49:39 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   .   
   >Le 2014-07-17 18:16, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:31:03 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Le 2014-07-10 02:25, Wisely Non-Theist a écrit :   
   >>>> In article , Olrik    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> It depends on the definition of that «god» thing.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> If your «god» existed, life would me like a Harry Potter book.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Would such a god be like  Harry or like Voldemort?   
   >>>   
   >>> There would me magic and fantasy all around.   
   >>   
   >>      LOL!!! I'll keep presenting this starting line over and over to see if   
   any   
   >> of you atheists are ever able to get as "far" as this particular starting   
   line:   
   >>   
   >> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -   
   Arthur   
   >> C. Clarke   
   >   
   >You absolutely have no clue whatsoever about what Clarke meant, did you?   
      
       Yes which is why I presented it for you. In your case, relative to God it   
   means that you believe if God exists what he accomplished he did using some   
   sort   
   of magic, when the reality is much more likely that if he exists he   
   accomplished   
   what he did using advanced technology that your little mind can only interpret   
   as magic.   
      
   >It's not «magic» when we understand it, replicate it and manufacture it.   
      
       Some things that aren't magic you can't understand, replicate or   
   manufacture   
   either. That's another starting line you can't get as "far" as. It would   
   possibly change your entire way of thinking if you ever could get as "far" as   
   either of these starting lines, but how could you ever get there? When could   
   you   
   ever get there?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)