XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: olrik666@yahoo.com   
      
   Le 2014-07-23 12:07, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   > On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 00:56:18 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >   
   >> Le 2014-07-19 16:54, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:49:39 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> Le 2014-07-17 18:16, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >>>>> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:31:03 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> Le 2014-07-10 02:25, Wisely Non-Theist a écrit :   
   >>>>>>> In article , Olrik    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It depends on the definition of that «god» thing.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> If your «god» existed, life would me like a Harry Potter book.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Would such a god be like  Harry or like Voldemort?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> There would me magic and fantasy all around.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>        LOL!!! I'll keep presenting this starting line over and over to   
   see if any   
   >>>>> of you atheists are ever able to get as "far" as this particular   
   starting line:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."   
   - Arthur   
   >>>>> C. Clarke   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You absolutely have no clue whatsoever about what Clarke meant, did you?   
   >>>   
   >>>       Yes which is why I presented it for you. In your case, relative to   
   God it   
   >>> means that you believe if God exists what he accomplished he did using   
   some sort   
   >>> of magic, when the reality is much more likely that if he exists he   
   accomplished   
   >>> what he did using advanced technology that your little mind can only   
   interpret   
   >>> as magic.   
   >>>   
   >>>> It's not «magic» when we understand it, replicate it and manufacture it.   
   >>>   
   >>>       Some things that aren't magic you can't understand, replicate or   
   manufacture   
   >>> either. That's another starting line you can't get as "far" as. It would   
   >>> possibly change your entire way of thinking if you ever could get as "far"   
   as   
   >>> either of these starting lines, but how could you ever get there? When   
   could you   
   >>> ever get there?   
   >>   
   >> I'll grant you this: you can type words on a keyboard.   
   >   
   >      I can share information and point out facts other people don't like to   
   think   
   > about while doing so too.   
      
   Indeed. That line of «reasoning» also applies to every degenerate   
   fucktards like you.   
      
   Keep up the good work. And please type words on your keyboard.   
      
      
   --   
   Olrik   
   aa #1981   
   EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)