XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic
XPost: alt.christnet
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 01:28:57 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>Le 2014-07-26 14:18, mur@.not. a écrit :
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:53:51 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>> .
>>> Le 2014-07-23 12:07, mur@.not. a écrit :
>>>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2014 00:56:18 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Le 2014-07-19 16:54, mur@.not. a écrit :
>>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:49:39 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> Le 2014-07-17 18:16, mur@.not. a écrit :
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 23:31:03 -0400, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 2014-07-10 02:25, Wisely Non-Theist a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>> In article , Olrik
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It depends on the definition of that «god» thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If your «god» existed, life would me like a Harry Potter book.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Would such a god be like Harry or like Voldemort?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There would me magic and fantasy all around.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL!!! I'll keep presenting this starting line over and over
to see if any
>>>>>>>> of you atheists are ever able to get as "far" as this particular
starting line:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic." - Arthur
>>>>>>>> C. Clarke
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You absolutely have no clue whatsoever about what Clarke meant, did
you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes which is why I presented it for you. In your case, relative
to God it
>>>>>> means that you believe if God exists what he accomplished he did using
some sort
>>>>>> of magic, when the reality is much more likely that if he exists he
accomplished
>>>>>> what he did using advanced technology that your little mind can only
interpret
>>>>>> as magic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not «magic» when we understand it, replicate it and manufacture
it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some things that aren't magic you can't understand, replicate or
manufacture
>>>>>> either. That's another starting line you can't get as "far" as. It would
>>>>>> possibly change your entire way of thinking if you ever could get as
"far" as
>>>>>> either of these starting lines, but how could you ever get there? When
could you
>>>>>> ever get there?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll grant you this: you can type words on a keyboard.
>>>>
>>>> I can share information and point out facts other people don't like
to think
>>>> about while doing so too.
>>>
>>> Indeed. That line of «reasoning» also applies to every degenerate
>>> fucktards like you.
>>
>> I point out facts you don't like to think about.
>
>Name it. I actually do like facts.
I consider what I told you about God and magic to be a fact. You apparently
don't.
>> In responce you make
>> childlike personal insults at me. How do you want people to think that
makes you
>> somehow superior?
>>
>>> Keep up the good work. And please type words on your keyboard.
>>
>> I encourage people to think beyond their tiny little mental comfort
zone.
>
>That applies to you too.
Like what?
>> People don't like that and act like you do for a while, then they become so
>> defeated by it that they finally give up and go hide. Better to give up and
go
>> hide entirely than to risk exposing your poor little brain to thoughts it
can't
>> handle, apparently. You might change into someone else, or something spooky
like
>> that.... Ooooh...scary.... I guess I was afraid of changing into a Mormon
when
>> I read the book of Mormon, less afraid of changing into a Muslim when I
read the
>> Koran, and by the time I read the Satanic Bible I wasn't afraid of changing
into
>> a Satanist. By then I'd learned that considering different concepts didn't
>> necessarily change me into what the author was encouraging. It just let me
know
>> what they were encouraging so I could think more openly and realistically
about
>> what it was/is.
>
>You seem confused.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
