XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 20:15:34 -0700, knight@baawa.com wrote:   
   .   
   >On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 14:50:31 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >snip most of the idiocy.   
   >   
   >   
   >>disclaimer: the stupid bullshit about God re-growing amputated limbs on   
   demand   
   >>does not count   
   >   
   >   It doesn't 'count'? Why not!?   
      
       Because it's stupid. You might as well claim that people should get   
   ANYTHING   
   they pray for EVERY TIME they pray. If you think not, then try to explain how   
   you want people to think growing limbs back is so unique and special.   
      
   >   Idiot. Evidence of a god should  be OBVIOUS to all humans. Not a   
   >conglomeration of ancient texts, conflicting dogmas and broken up   
   >sects.   
      
       Tell me why you people want other people to think that if amputated limbs   
   DID grow back for humans as they do for some other creatures, it would be any   
   more evidence of God's existence than it is that bones heal when they are   
   broken.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)