XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:25:29 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:54:19 -0400, the following appeared   
   >in sci.skeptic, posted by mur@.not.:   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:23:51 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 17:34:26 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:06:26 -0700, Bob Casanova  wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:50:05 -0400, the following appeared   
   >>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by mur@.not.:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:56:28 -0700, Bob Casanova wussed horribly:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Sun, 03 Aug 2014 14:50:31 -0400, the following appeared   
   >>>>>>>in sci.skeptic, posted by mur@.not.:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>When challenged directly and specifically about the supposed   
   >>>>>>>>evidence they think should exist...   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>>It's up to the claimant (that's you) to provide the evidence   
   >>>>>>>to support the claim. Provide the evidence you think you   
   >>>>>>>have and we can discuss it; it's *your* responsibility to   
   >>>>>>>support your contention. *You* think you have evidence;   
   >>>>>>>*you* provide it.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>    Then why isn't it up to the atheist to explain WHAT he thinks he's   
   trying to   
   >>>>>>talk about?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Because it's up to the claimant (that's you) to provide the   
   >>>>>evidence to support the claim.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    The claim is that none of you have any idea what you think you're   
   trying to   
   >>>>talk about when you demand evidence of God's existence, and every one of   
   you has   
   >>>>provided proof that what I pointed out is correct. My claim has been   
   proven true   
   >>>>by ALL OF YOU.   
   >>>   
   >>>Sorry, but no;   
   >>   
   >>    That's a blatant lie.   
   >   
   >Sorry, but no   
      
       That's a repeat of the desperately blatant lie which proves that none of   
   you   
   have any idea what you think you're trying to talk about when you demand   
   evidence, and can't even pretend you do. Repeating the desperate lie is proof   
   that you're ashamed of your position, as you certainly should be.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)