XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:01:43 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   .   
   >On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:42:44 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 21:22:20 -0500, bilgat@m.nu wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:57:31 -0400, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >   
   >>>>>Cool. Now that the knowledge aspect is out of the way, how about belief?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Do you believe in any «god» or «gods»?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Considering the size of the universe I believe it's FAR more likely   
   that   
   >>>>there are beings who can be considered Gods in it in some places than that   
   there   
   >>>>are none anywhere. Whether or not there are any associated with this   
   planet I'm   
   >>>>somewhat less confident, but it seems more likely than not that there are   
   from   
   >>>>my pov.   
   >>>   
   >>>you freakin idiot. you are a god amongst sheep   
   >>   
   >>    Not from my pov, since I don't believe a being can be the God of a   
   planet he   
   >>is native to.   
   >>   
   >>>does that mean that we   
   >>>are gods? no   
   >>>What it does mean is that you are still a freakin idiot   
   >>   
   >>    And you're still an idiot to think you know there are no beings who can   
   be   
   >>considered gods anywhere in the universe. It's an incredibly stupid idea to   
   >>think there's any way you could possibly have found out.   
   >>   
   > so, can you say why?   
      
       Because there's no way you could possibly have found out. Duh.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)