XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic
XPost: alt.christnet
From: olrik666@yahoo.com
Le 2014-09-13 11:57, mur@.not. a écrit :
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:14:54 -0400, Olrik wrote:
> .
>> Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
>>> Would they be able to post at all?
>>
>> What lies?
>
> All of them. Of course the biggest is that there's no evidence for God's
> existence, when if there really was no evidence there would be nothing for
> anyone to believe in. So that's the most blatant of all. Probably the next
most
> blatant is to lie that no one has told any of you what evidence there is.
Even
> after having it pointed out for you you people often lie that none have ever
> been presented. You might like to say that's all just one lie, but it's two
> different lies. The first lie is a lie about the condition of this planet we
> live on, lying that there's no evidence of God anywhere on it. The second is
a
> lie about the people who post here, lying that they haven't done what they
have
> done. Then there are those of you who lie that you know God doesn't exist,
when
> it's obvious that no one could know that even if it's true. Then there are
those
> who lie that they've provided proof that God doesn't exist, which again is
> something that can't be done. Another common lie is for someone who has made
it
> clear they believe God does not exist, to lie that they have no belief. Then
> there are those who lie that we don't understand the difference between
having
> no belief, and believing God doesn't exist. Those are some of the lies.
You abuse the English language.
Redeem yourself by providing evidence of that «god» you talk about.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
