XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.christnet   
   XPost: sci.sceptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 15-September-2014 3:38 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:   
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:18:11 +1000, the following appeared   
   > in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger :   
   >   
   >> On 14-September-2014 4:06 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:13:48 -0400, the following appeared   
   >>> in sci.skeptic, posted by mur@.not.:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:38:03 -0700, Bob Casanova continued ask for   
   >>>>>>>>>> objective evidence:   
   >> well duh! it aint called 'religious faith' for no reason. you either   
   >> accept what evidence there is eg. the biblical record, testimony, etc.,   
   >> or you don't   
   > Once more, followups set appropriately, to those groups   
   > which accept subjective evidence.   
      
   listen you f*n wanker.. I'm REPLYING in a THREAD, that YOU are posting   
   to in alt.agnosticsm. if you don't like it then just suck it up. YOU   
   don't get to tell me where I can post or not! but what *IS* your   
   problem?? you are discussing with mur who is replying in sci.sceptic, so   
   why single me out to demand I do not reply? I will reply in any thread   
   as it appears in alt.agnosticism and not make any adjustments just to   
   suit your pathetic sensitivities! so go screw yerself yer wanker!! it's   
   not my fault that you can't handle the truth!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)