XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, alt.christnet   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 16-September-2014 12:59 PM, felix_unger wrote:   
      
   > On 15-September-2014 3:38 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 22:18:11 +1000, the following appeared   
   >> in sci.skeptic, posted by felix_unger :   
   >>   
   >>> On 14-September-2014 4:06 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 12:13:48 -0400, the following appeared   
   >>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by mur@.not.:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:38:03 -0700, Bob Casanova continued   
   >>>>>>>>>>> ask for   
   >>>>>>>>>>> objective evidence:   
   >>> well duh! it aint called 'religious faith' for no reason. you either   
   >>> accept what evidence there is eg. the biblical record, testimony, etc.,   
   >>> or you don't   
   >> Once more, followups set appropriately, to those groups   
   >> which accept subjective evidence.   
   >   
   > listen you f*n wanker.. I'm REPLYING in a THREAD, that YOU are posting   
   > to in alt.agnosticsm. if you don't like it then just suck it up. YOU   
   > don't get to tell me where I can post or not! but what *IS* your   
   > problem?? you are discussing with mur who is replying in sci.sceptic,   
   > so why single me out to demand I do not reply? I will reply in any   
   > thread as it appears in alt.agnosticism and not make any adjustments   
   > just to suit your pathetic sensitivities! so go screw yerself yer   
   > wanker!! it's not my fault that you can't handle the truth!   
   >   
      
   that reply was somewhat emotional so let me explain it all to you   
   factually.. YOU post FROM sci.skeptic in a thread that appears in   
   alt.agnosticism. I post in alt.agnosticism, therefore I see what you   
   post here. by demanding that I do not include the ng sci.skeptic in a   
   reply to anything that you post in alt.agnosticism is effectively   
   denying me a right of reply to your comments, since if I were to reply   
   only to the other groups in the thread, you would not see my reply. this   
   is what you want of course- to have your say but deny me mine. it is   
   cowardly behaviour, and it indicates that you lack confidence in your   
   ability to rebut any arguments I have or might put forward. it is in in   
   fact an endorsement of the veracity of my remarks, since you are   
   'running scared' from them.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)