XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: olrik666@yahoo.com   
      
   Le 2014-09-18 17:21, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:01:38 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   > .   
   >> Le 2014-09-13 11:57, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:14:54 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>> Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >>>>>        Would they be able to post at all?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> What lies?   
   >>>   
   >>>       All of them. Of course the biggest is that there's no evidence for   
   God's   
   >>> existence, when if there really was no evidence there would be nothing for   
   >>> anyone to believe in. So that's the most blatant of all. Probably the next   
   most   
   >>> blatant is to lie that no one has told any of you what evidence there is.   
   Even   
   >>> after having it pointed out for you you people often lie that none have   
   ever   
   >>> been presented. You might like to say that's all just one lie, but it's two   
   >>> different lies. The first lie is a lie about the condition of this planet   
   we   
   >>> live on, lying that there's no evidence of God anywhere on it. The second   
   is a   
   >>> lie about the people who post here, lying that they haven't done what they   
   have   
   >>> done. Then there are those of you who lie that you know God doesn't exist,   
   when   
   >>> it's obvious that no one could know that even if it's true. Then there are   
   those   
   >>> who lie that they've provided proof that God doesn't exist, which again is   
   >>> something that can't be done. Another common lie is for someone who has   
   made it   
   >>> clear they believe God does not exist, to lie that they have no belief.   
   Then   
   >>> there are those who lie that we don't understand the difference between   
   having   
   >>> no belief, and believing God doesn't exist. Those are some of the lies.   
   >>   
   >> You abuse the English language.   
   >>   
   >> Redeem yourself by providing evidence of that «god» you talk about.   
   >   
   >      Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be", WHERE   
   you   
   > think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit for   
   him   
   > to provide us with it if he exists.   
      
   Nobody dies anymore. Or amputees grow new limbs. Those would be   
   miracles, wouldn't they?   
      
   --   
   Olrik   
   aa #1981   
   EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)