XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 23:56:52 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   .   
   >Le 2014-09-18 17:21, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >> On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 01:01:38 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >> .   
   >>> Le 2014-09-13 11:57, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 23:14:54 -0400, Olrik  wrote:   
   >>>> .   
   >>>>> Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :   
   >>>>>>        Would they be able to post at all?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What lies?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>       All of them. Of course the biggest is that there's no evidence for   
   God's   
   >>>> existence, when if there really was no evidence there would be nothing for   
   >>>> anyone to believe in. So that's the most blatant of all. Probably the   
   next most   
   >>>> blatant is to lie that no one has told any of you what evidence there is.   
   Even   
   >>>> after having it pointed out for you you people often lie that none have   
   ever   
   >>>> been presented. You might like to say that's all just one lie, but it's   
   two   
   >>>> different lies. The first lie is a lie about the condition of this planet   
   we   
   >>>> live on, lying that there's no evidence of God anywhere on it. The second   
   is a   
   >>>> lie about the people who post here, lying that they haven't done what   
   they have   
   >>>> done. Then there are those of you who lie that you know God doesn't   
   exist, when   
   >>>> it's obvious that no one could know that even if it's true. Then there   
   are those   
   >>>> who lie that they've provided proof that God doesn't exist, which again is   
   >>>> something that can't be done. Another common lie is for someone who has   
   made it   
   >>>> clear they believe God does not exist, to lie that they have no belief.   
   Then   
   >>>> there are those who lie that we don't understand the difference between   
   having   
   >>>> no belief, and believing God doesn't exist. Those are some of the lies.   
   >>>   
   >>> You abuse the English language.   
   >>>   
   >>> Redeem yourself by providing evidence of that «god» you talk about.   
   >>   
   >>      Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be",   
   WHERE you   
   >> think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit for   
   him   
   >> to provide us with it if he exists.   
   >   
   >Nobody dies anymore. Or amputees grow new limbs. Those would be   
   >miracles, wouldn't they?   
      
       For all we know life is a miracle but you can't get as "far as" that basic   
   starting line, so what makes you think you could get to one of them if humans   
   regrew lost limbs?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)