XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:58:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <5425394a$0$23226$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk>,   
   > "Malte Runz"  wrote:   
   >   
   >> "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:c8knkgF3gsmU2@mid.individual.net...   
   >> >   
   >> > On 26-September-2014 8:35 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >> > > On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:57:27 +1000, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >> > > ..   
   >> > >> On 21-September-2014 9:49 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >> > >>   
   >> > >>> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> > >>> news:c81ljaF5tc9U1@mid.individual.net...   
   >> > >>>   
   >> > >>> (snip)   
   >> > >>>   
   >> > >>>> we don't think the bible exists, it does exist. we don't think the   
   >> > >>>> koran   
   >> > >>>> exists, it does exist. etc.,   
   >> > >>> And some people know they have been abducted by aliens. You never told   
   >> > >>> me if   
   >> > >>> you think their testimony is evidence for UFOs visiting Earth.   
   >> > >>>   
   >> > >>> (snip)   
   >> > >>>   
   >> > >> if there are ppl who testify to having been abducted by aliens, then it   
   >> > >> is evidence for alien visitations. just as the various reported   
   >> > >> sightings of UFO's are. what do you think they are evidence for? your   
   >> > >> football team winning the superbowl?   
   >> > >      These people who can't consider the possibility that God exists   
   >> > > also seem   
   >> > > unable to comprehend that some evidence is false. I can't even imagine   
   >> > > being so   
   >> > > horribly mentally restricted, but then I guess they can't imagine not   
   >> > > being so   
   >> > > horribly mentally restricted. LOL....if they could, then I guess they   
   >> > > wouldn't   
   >> > > be...LOL...   
   >> >   
   >> > LOL! they are so desperate to deny there's any evidence for God they tie   
   >> > themselves up in knots trying to prove evidence is not evidence   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >What evidence?   
      
       Try to explain WHAT sort of evidence you think there "should be", WHERE you   
   think it "should be", and WHY you think it "should be" to God's benefit for him   
   to provide us with it if he exists.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)