XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 23:08:31 +1000, felix_unger  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 26-September-2014 8:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> news:c8knkgF3gsmU2@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>   
   >>> On 26-September-2014 8:35 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>> > On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:57:27 +1000, felix_unger    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>> > ..   
   >>> >> On 21-September-2014 9:49 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >>> >>   
   >>> >>> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen   
   >>> >>> news:c81ljaF5tc9U1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>> >>>   
   >>> >>> (snip)   
   >>> >>>   
   >>> >>>> we don't think the bible exists, it does exist. we don't think   
   >>> the >>>> koran   
   >>> >>>> exists, it does exist. etc.,   
   >>> >>> And some people know they have been abducted by aliens. You never   
   >>> told   
   >>> >>> me if   
   >>> >>> you think their testimony is evidence for UFOs visiting Earth.   
   >>> >>>   
   >>> >>> (snip)   
   >>> >>>   
   >>> >> if there are ppl who testify to having been abducted by aliens,   
   >>> then it   
   >>> >> is evidence for alien visitations. just as the various reported   
   >>> >> sightings of UFO's are. what do you think they are evidence for? your   
   >>> >> football team winning the superbowl?   
   >>> > These people who can't consider the possibility that God exists >   
   >>> also seem   
   >>> > unable to comprehend that some evidence is false. I can't even   
   >>> imagine > being so   
   >>> > horribly mentally restricted, but then I guess they can't imagine   
   >>> not > being so   
   >>> > horribly mentally restricted. LOL....if they could, then I guess   
   >>> they > wouldn't   
   >>> > be...LOL...   
   >>>   
   >>> LOL! they are so desperate to deny there's any evidence for God they   
   >>> tie themselves up in knots trying to prove evidence is not evidence   
   >>   
   >> Actually it is you who has to defend the possible existence of   
   >> Dog-heads, Aliens and probings, Atlantis, Bigfoot and so on, in order   
   >> to being to claim that simple heresay is evidence for the existence of   
   >> gods.   
   >   
   >so there's NO evidence for Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, UFO's, etc.,   
   >etc., just because no one can prove they exist, right? wrong!   
      
       It's one thing to believe none of the evidence was produced from or in   
   referrence to something that actually does exist. That is just putting faith in   
   the possibility that all of the evidence is false. But it's very much a   
   different thing to be so incredibly stupid as to honestly believe there is no   
   evidence at all...not even any false evidence. This particular aspect is   
   certainly one where the question arrises whether these people are honestly   
   stupid enough to believe their own claim that there is no evidence at all which   
   would be horribly incredibly stupid, or if they're so very comfortable with   
   blatantly lying that they don't mind pretending they're more stupid than they   
   actually are. Either way it shows that they're on an extremely low level.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)