XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 03-October-2014 8:26 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
      
   > On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:28:14 +0100, grabber  wrote:   
   > ..   
   >> On 29/09/2014 02:28, felix_unger wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I'm happy to discuss any topic of mutual interest, but there has to be   
   >>> agreement on the basics first. we can't proceed to discuss 'B' unless we   
   >>> first agree about 'A' .   
   >> Wrong. You don't have to use the word evidence at all.   
   >>   
   >> Allow me to translate:   
   >>   
   >> I think when Malte says   
   >>   
   >> "there is no evidence for god, or Nessie, or Dogheads"   
   >>   
   >> he probably means something like   
   >>   
   >> "there is no verifiable material that gives adequate grounds for belief   
   >> in god, or Nessie, or Dogheads"   
   >>   
   >> I am sure that Malte could adjust this wording if it's not quite right.   
   >      If God does exist at least some of the evidence of his existence is   
   false   
   > evidence. If God does not exist then ALL evidence is false evidence. By   
   claiming   
   > there's no evidence the moron is saying that there's no false evidence, even   
   > though every bit of it might be false and it's pretty much certain that   
   there's   
   > some false evidence. So that narrow, shallow and from my pov horribly   
   dishonest   
   > position could not be much more incorrect.   
      
   well said!   
      
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -   
   Barack Obama   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)