XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: malte_runz@forgitit.dk   
      
   "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:c993fgFc2ujU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >   
   > On 02-October-2014 8:28 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >   
   > > "grabber"  skrev i meddelelsen news:OQWWv.326598$4X4.248854@fx28.am4...   
      
   (snip)   
      
   > >> Allow me to translate:   
   > >>   
   > >> I think when Malte says   
   > >>   
   > >> "there is no evidence for god, or Nessie, or Dogheads"   
   > >>   
   > >> he probably means something like   
   > >>   
   > >> "there is no verifiable material that gives adequate grounds for belief   
   > >> in god, or Nessie, or Dogheads"   
   > >>   
   > >> I am sure that Malte could adjust this wording if it's not quite right.   
   > >   
   > > Spot on. I'll just add that the material, that is presented, does not   
   > > qualify as 'evidence', because it does not gives ground for belief.   
   >   
   > so the biblical stories of Jesus are not 'ground for belief' - despite the   
   > fact the entire Christian religion is based on them?! ...   
      
   Argumentum ad populum.   
      
      
   > ... you're unbelieveable!   
      
   No, I'm an 'unbeliever'.   
      
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)