XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 05-October-2014 12:37 AM, Free Lunch wrote:   
   > On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:33:27 +1000, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 03-October-2014 8:27 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   > ....   
   >>>       They lie that there is no evidence at all to the extent of denying   
   that   
   >>> there's any false evidence. And they have no idea at all what evidence they   
   >>> think should be where much less why they think it should be wherever, if   
   God   
   >>> does exist. So what COULD they discuss???   
   >> surprising isn't it how they don't seem to be able to appreciate the   
   >> basics such as evidence does not have to be proof, or even something   
   >> that leads to proof, evidence can be false evidence, evidence can be   
   >> weak or strong evidence, etc., etc., all because they want to deny there   
   >> is ANY evidence for God simply to bolster their 'no gods' position.   
   > No, false claims (or as you confusingly say 'false evidence') are not   
   > evidence. You have made it clear that you know that you have no evidence   
   > that supports the claim that some god or other exists, yet you insist   
   > that there must be evidence for the existence of gods.   
      
   Is there evidence for..   
      
   (a) the Loch Ness Monster   
      
   (b) UFO's   
      
   (c) Bigfoot/Yeti   
      
   please answer 'yes' or 'no' only to each   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -   
   Barack Hussein Obama   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)