XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 05-October-2014 11:20 AM, Malte Runz wrote:   
      
   > "grabber" skrev i meddelelsen news:CAVXv.618785$ZX5.240504@fx32.am4...   
   >>   
   >> ... I think felix wants to understand "evidence" as having a very   
   >> broad meaning,   
      
   just the general meaning   
      
   >> something like "any form of testimony or anything that could be   
   >> construed as an indication". In that sense, he's right that there is   
   >> evidence of all of those things.   
      
   thank you!   
      
   >   
   > We gain nothing by rendering definitions meaningless, and that's what   
   > he is doing.   
      
   I do nothing of the sort. I simply use the normal definition of   
   evidence, as I have told you repeatedly, so you should bloodywell know   
   by now!   
      
   > He ends up having to defend the possible existence of Dog-Heads   
      
   Lets suppose that we want to discuss the existence of your dogheads.   
   What are we going to say we will do? will we say.. "Let's discuss the   
   reports of/about, the sightings of, any testimony about, the writings   
   about, any documents relating to, the oral tradition about, any known   
   interactions with, any artifacts of, the habitats of, and anything else   
   we can think of relating to, the dogheads." of course not! we would   
   simply say "Let's examine the EVIDENCE for the dogheads" which would   
   encompass all of that! duh!   
      
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -   
   Barack Hussein Obama   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)