XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 22:03:32 +0100, grabber  wrote:   
      
   >On 05/10/2014 02:36, felix_unger wrote:   
   >> On 05-October-2014 12:34 AM, grabber wrote:   
   ...   
      
   >>> What do you think they mean by "evidence" when they claim that?   
   >>   
   >> they mean proof, and that's why they're wrong   
   >   
   >If they did mean "proof" (though I think in fact they mean something   
   >rather less), then they would uncontroversially right - I think even you   
   >accept that we have no proof that god exists.   
      
   Evidence is a fine word. Don't try to mislead. Theists have no evidence   
   that their god exists or that the god they worship is the correct one,   
   unlike the many other gods that are worshipped by other theists.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)