XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: me@nothere.biz   
      
   On 06-October-2014 9:57 AM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   > On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 09:37:35 -0500, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:33:27 +1000, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 03-October-2014 8:27 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >> ...   
   >>>>       They lie that there is no evidence at all to the extent of denying   
   that   
   >>>> there's any false evidence. And they have no idea at all what evidence   
   they   
   >>>> think should be where much less why they think it should be wherever, if   
   God   
   >>>> does exist. So what COULD they discuss???   
   >>> surprising isn't it how they don't seem to be able to appreciate the   
   >>> basics such as evidence does not have to be proof, or even something   
   >>> that leads to proof, evidence can be false evidence, evidence can be   
   >>> weak or strong evidence, etc., etc., all because they want to deny there   
   >>> is ANY evidence for God simply to bolster their 'no gods' position.   
   >> No, false claims (or as you confusingly say 'false evidence') are not   
   >> evidence.   
   > http://is.gd/K1Bmu4   
   >   
   > You moron.   
      
   I think atheism has pickled their brains!.. :)   
      
   --   
   rgds,   
      
   Pete   
   -------   
   It's not about Islam!.. http://ausnet.info/pics/islam.png   
   Islam is a religion of peace!.. http://thereligionofpeace.com   
   http://pamelageller.com/   
   “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” -   
   Barack Hussein Obama   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)