XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
      
   On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:21:24 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   .   
   >On 06-October-2014 9:59 AM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:21:24 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:42:23 +0200, "Malte Runz"    
   wrote:   
   >>>> ..   
   >>>>> "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen news:c8l6qoF7l3bU1@mid.   
   ndividual.net...   
   >>>>>> On 26-September-2014 8:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >>>>> (snip)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Actually it is you who has to defend the possible existence of   
   >>>>>>> Dog-heads, Aliens and probings, Atlantis, Bigfoot and so on, in order   
   to   
   >>>>>>> being to claim that simple heresay is evidence for the existence of   
   >>>>>>> gods.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> so there's NO evidence for Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, UFO's, etc.,   
   >>>>>> etc., ...   
   >>>>> That's right. There isn't.   
   >>>> http://is.gd/jKsoLt   
   >>> http://www.ufoevidence.org/   
   >>      Maybe there's no evidence of atheists.   
   >   
   >there's plenty of evidence they don't function like normal ppl.. :)   
      
       Their faith is so strong it restricts their minds from considering anything   
   that works against what they desperately want to retain their faith in.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)