XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, sci.skeptic   
   XPost: alt.christnet   
   From: noyouare@notgetting.it   
      
   On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 02:42:45 -0700, Kaptain Krunch   
    wrote:   
      
   >In article ,   
   > felix_unger  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:   
   >> > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:42:23 +0200, "Malte Runz"    
   >> > wrote:   
   >> > ..   
   >> >> "felix_unger"  skrev i meddelelsen   
   >> >> news:c8l6qoF7l3bU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >> >>> On 26-September-2014 8:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:   
   >> >> (snip)   
   >> >>   
   >> >>>> Actually it is you who has to defend the possible existence of   
   >> >>>> Dog-heads, Aliens and probings, Atlantis, Bigfoot and so on, in order   
   to   
   >> >>>> being to claim that simple heresay is evidence for the existence of   
   >> >>>> gods.   
   >> >>>>   
   >There is NO EVIDENCE.  So if you are waiting for some evidence from God   
   >you are making a mistake.  ...   
      
   (I assume you're responding to my reply to felix_unger)   
      
   I'm not waiting for evidence from God. I don't believe God exists, in   
   case you have forgotten.   
      
      
   > ... God explained thru his servant Paul ...   
      
   I couldn't care less about what some guy claimed was revealed to him   
   by a god thousands of years ago. Hearsay is not evidence, which was   
   what the debate was about.   
      
   (snip)   
      
   --   
   Malte Runz   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)