XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.agnosticism
XPost: sci.skeptic
From: f00@0f0.00f
anthk wrote:
> On 2024-10-02, shogun wrote:
>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared
>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>> :
>>>
>>>> shogun writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in
>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom
>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is
>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer
>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.
>>>>>
>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and
>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>
>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly
>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,
>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".
>>>>
>>
>>
>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on
>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no
>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.
>>
>>
>>
>
> The closest to a religion I'd believe would be synchronicity+pansichysm, but
far from
> any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.
>
there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism....
ehhh dont think so.
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
