XPost: alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.agnosticism
XPost: sci.skeptic
From: f00@0f0.00f
% wrote:
> jojo wrote:
>> % wrote:
>>> jojo wrote:
>>>> Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:
>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/4/2024 11:10 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 4 Oct 2024 10:45:56 +0000, the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:25 +0000, the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shogun writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wikipedia “educates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blasphemy laws and defends freedom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticism of religion which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 50 years ago is no longer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2020s and post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Islamic controlled world, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many other places as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopelessly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> immediate social circle,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i would regard religious people as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fundamentally wrong, being on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means it provides no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to become obsolete.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already knew I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice. so are you a pious person?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accuracy of my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment either way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> curious and want to know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of views believers and non-believers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espouse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, both "espouse" the same reality, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facts of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which are not subject to belief or disbelief.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that's a nice dream.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't it, though?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a nice day, and try to expand beyond your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> parochialism
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WRT the relevance of religion; the world isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identical to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your social circle.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Bob,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Heads up about Jojo -- Mom needs to take his (her?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet away, and until that happens, discretion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is advised.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dawn, dont be rude!!! also, i have a penis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> where did you get it , by the train tracks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i got it because my cells differentiated because i
>>>>>>>>>>> have a y chromosome.. aaa capiche?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that's no reason
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> that is all the reason and the only reason.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sorry , you have to post a pic with it beside your face
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> lol i am not posting it here or anywhere! now that i think
>>>>>>> about it, i have never taken its pic...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> and make sure to wear your top hat
>>>>>
>>>>> And your gay sweater
>>>>
>>>> i dont think i will take a photo of my penis.
>>>>
>>> yes in a top hat
>>
>> hat or no hat.... wait top hat for the penis or the head?
>>
> both
i dont have any hats, who wears hats anyway? i have never seen
anyone wearing a hat. these days people wear caps, and i dont
like those anyway.
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
