On Sunday, December 22, 2019 at 5:11:15 PM UTC-5, adam.oz...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > Your wife wasn't murdered and [if] she   
   > was you more than anyone would be the   
   > likely suspect.   
      
   This is a serious point. I really wish we didn't have to discuss the sad   
   passing of the woman, but if Nima insists on bringing it up, and absurdly   
   accusing us of playing some sort of role, then, I'm sorry, but that is going   
   to raise the question of who,    
   between us and Nima, is more likely to bear culpability in her passing (if   
   anyone does). I do not believe he really wants to have that discussion.   
       
      
   Adam continued:   
   > This is like the second person you've   
   > been in a relationship with who died   
   > a very premature death followed by you   
   > uprooting and high tailing it across   
   > the world.   
      
   And this adds another layer to the question of who is more likely to bear   
   culpability. Again, I do not want to explore this subject, but if Nima keeps   
   on bringing it up, and keeps on accusing us of being somehow culpable, the   
   question is eventually going    
   to get explored. We might ask: who was in the same apartment as her at the   
   time of her passing, him or us? We might note that we weren't even in the same   
   continent, much less the same country, city, or apartment. We might ask: who   
   dabbles in highly toxic    
   brews which have aged him prematurely, him or us? We might ask about the   
   bizarre parallel of two women passing twenty-five years apart, one in New   
   Mexico in 1994 and the other in Berlin in 2019, and in both cases, the man   
   each woman was in a relationship    
   with (the very same man in both cases) abruptly leaving the area shortly   
   thereafter. We might ask how we could be considered more culpable than Nima,   
   in light of all this. We don't want to go there, but if Nima insists on   
   bringing this subject up, we    
   eventually will go there.   
      
       
      
   Adam continued:   
   > this is logical given [...] the fact   
   > that you project your own one time   
   > interests and positions onto those   
   > you've decided are worthy of the   
   > endless abyss of malice that is your   
   > deformed hallucinogen intoxicated soul.   
      
   Another valuable point. Nima has a long history of accusing others of things   
   which are true of himself. He accuses people of (gasp!) having Jewish   
   ancestry, when this is true of himself, he accuses others of having Baha'i   
   parents, when this is true of    
   himself, he accuses others of supporting color revolutions, when this was true   
   of himself, he accuses others of dabbling in Satanism, when this is true of   
   himself, he accuses others of posting to the obscure CSS forum, when this was   
   true of himself, and    
   on and on it goes. Noting his long history of projection, I shudder to think   
   that this might apply even to his bizarre claim that others bear some   
   culpability in the sad passing of the second woman to leave this earth   
   prematurely while in a relationship    
   with him.   
      
   I sincerely hope Nima meditates on this veritable tafsir of Adam's comments,   
   and grasps the gravity of the game he is playing. We can correspond on   
   whatever topic Nima wants to correspond on, but if he insists on throwing   
   around false accusations of    
   culpability in the sad passing of a woman, that discussion is likely to take   
   an ugly turn.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)